Hardy's Jude and Weber's Ethic.
Whereas Eustacia Vye in The Return of the Native immerses herself in the natural environment of the heath (as I wrote of in my earlier blog), Jude Fawley of Hardy’s last novel, Jude the Obscure, recognizes the beauty of nature alongside of its ugliness and longs to be free of it. In so doing, he finds himself, over the course of the novel, denied the progress of the mind he pursues. He inadvertently attempts to escape into the virtues of a work ethic that can be compared to Hardy’s contemporary Max Weber’s ideas of the edification of the soul through work, the Protestant work ethic. We can compare the humanism Weber calls for through humble work to Jude’s search for a humanistic edification of his character and better understand the transition of society into the industrial age and how that transition affects the induvial for theoretical good or harm.
At the start of Jude the Obscure, Hardy writes of Jude’s own immersion into a oneness with nature that he was born into in his rural roots, expressed in how the land reminds him of its place in the pleasures of life, especially those of a sexual nature:
…to every clod and stone
there really attached associations enough and to
spare—echoes of songs from ancient harvest-days, of spoken words,
and of sturdy
deeds. Every inch of ground had been the site, first or last, of
energy, gaiety, horse-
play, bickerings, weariness. Groups of gleaners had squatted in
the sun on every
square yard. Love-matches that had populated the adjoining hamlet
had been made
up there between reaping and carrying. Under the hedge which
divided the field
from a distant plantation girls had given themselves to lovers who
would not turn
their heads to look at them by the next harvest; and in that
ancient cornfield many
a man had made love-promises to a woman at whose voice he had
trembled by the
next seed-time…. II. par. 10.
Clearly Jude
holds a romantic notion of how this natural environment produced the pleasures
of days gone by. Yet Jude longs to go away from this natural environment,
escaping into the life of the mind at the distant town where a college sits. He
finds this idea preferable to staying with the ugliness which he also perceives
inherent in the heath:
The brown surface of the
field went right up towards the sky all round, where
it was lost by degrees in the mist that shut out the actual verge
and accentuated the solitude. The only marks on the uniformity of the scene
were a rick of last year’s
produce standing in the midst of the arable, the rooks that rose
at his approach, and
the path athwart the fallow by which he had come, trodden now by
he hardly knew whom, though once by many of his own dead family.
“How ugly it is here!” he
murmured. II. pars. 8-9.
Jude longs to
escape into the world of the human intellect. He thinks the road to this is by
getting to the nearest city where he has a friend in the university, hoping
that the friend will enable him to be a student, the pathway he sees as his
road out of the ugliness of the environment of his youth. Hardy's novel reflects the broader societal
upheavals of the Industrial Revolution through the character of Jude, a young
man realizing the limitations of the agrarian society into which he was born. Jude realizes that
traditional agrarian communities face disruption in the face of an Industrial
Revolution, and he abandons the agrarian world just as the industrialized world
urges. But unlike industry, Jude yearns for the development of humanity.
Jude uses this humanistic urge,
originating in his humble roots and developed through a course of scholarly study,
as an impetus for his evolution as an individual in his contemporary world.
Max Weber, writing at
the same time of the late novels of Hardy, tells why humanism is preferable to
industrialism, especially the morality that becomes inherent in humanism at its
simplest level, that of the hard worker:
“We want to cultivate
and support what appears to us as valuable in man: his
personal
responsibility, his basic drive toward higher things, toward the spiritual
and moral values of
mankind, even where this drive confronts us in its most
primitive form.
Insofar as it is within our power we want to create the external
conditions which will help to preserve—in the face of the inevitable struggle for
existence with its suffering—the best that is in men, those physical and emotional
qualities which
we would like to maintain for the nation” (Weber, 1894 speech
before the Evangelische-Soziale
Kongress, quoted in Bendix, 44).
What Weber speaks to here is the humanism of
workers, farmers in particular, in relation to the landowners and
industrialists that are determining the economic and political zeitgeist of the
society. The “most primitive form” Weber writes of here is that of human
individuals who are farm laborers, the economically simple. These individuals
contain the “drive toward higher things” that is truly important for the
self-definition of human beings. We “foster and maintain” these qualities “for
the nation,” but we do so at an individual level. This individual level is best
realized when the economic level of the individual is simple, a life unclouded
by the zeal for economic advancement.
Jude
understands the common life of a farmer, the beauty of the land growing from
the ground and through the shoes of the individual who becomes one with the
land. But he understands the ugliness of that life also, the crude qualities of
the muck and the mud, the hunger that comes from physical striving with no
immediate reward. Jude imagines the way out of this ugliness is through the
development of the mind. But he gets caught in the crudity of the industrial
world, the society that tells him he must support himself and those dependent on
him or else go hungry. He becomes a stonemason in order to appease this place
in which this industrial world places him. But the stones do not hold the
beauty that was inherent in the land of his childhood, even though that beauty
also held a flip side of ugliness.
Rest
assured, I am not attempting a Marxist review of Jude…, dependent on
economics as its only theme. My intent is as ecocritical as the sense of
place I associate with Eustacia Vye in The Return of the Native. Environment
as a theme is Hardy is well documented; see, for instance, Barrett’s “Character
and Environment in Hardy’s Fiction” (2012). But Jude’s society will not let him
explore the wonders of the human mind as he wants. He cannot, therefore, escape
the harshness of the earth, together with its beauty, except to plunge deeper
into the squalid life of the worker in the industrial world.
Jude tries to compensate
by living out of wedlock and raising a family with the novel’s magnificent
female character Sue Bridehead, who is married also. As a suffragette, she
accompanies Jude into a world counter to the culture of proper industrial
society. Nothing appeases their longing for something better, their need to get
beyond the norms that imprison them, and the situation ends tragically.
Because Jude appears
to have no hope, or a hope that ever diminishes wherever he turns his head,
Hardy’s final novel reads also as his bleakest. The mysticism of the land,
which Eustacia Vye never completely abandons, is gone after the first few
chapters, and Jude sets himself headed away from Weber’s simple “best that is
in men.”
Barrett, Charlotte. “Character
and Environment in Thomas Hardy's Fiction,” http://writersinspire.org/content/character-environment-thomas-hardys-fiction licensed as Creative
Commons BY-NC-SA (2.0 UK). Published on 15 May 2012. Accessed on 21 February
2024.
Hardy, Thomas. Jude the Obscure. Project Gutenberg. Release Date: August, 1994 [eBook #153] [Most recently
updated: August 28, 2022] [original publication 1890.] https://www.gutenberg.org/files/153/153-h/153-h.htm
Weber, Max. “Speech before Evangelische Soziale Kongres,
1894,” reprinted in Richard Bendix, Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait.
Doubleday, Anchor, 1962, p. 44.
Nick Harris, February 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment